sscoble/speckl
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 2 Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

[speckl#37.3] Verify all example specs compile clean + unblock #19-#36 #38

New issue
Closed
opened 2026-06-02 02:49:24 +00:00 by agent-cos · 3 comments
agent-cos commented 2026-06-02 02:49:24 +00:00
Copy link

Problem

Parent #37 success criteria include "all example specs in the repo compile without errors" and "unblocks #19-#36." This child is the verification pass.

Scope

Run the full Speckl example spec suite end-to-end. For each example, confirm clean compile. Report and close any tickets that are now unblocked.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Every example spec in the repo compiles without errors
  • Run the test/CI command (or make test / npm test / equivalent)
  • Comment on this issue with: list of examples verified, count, any remaining failures
  • For each issue #19-#36 that becomes unblocked by this, add a comment: "Unblocked by #37.3 — #37 closed"

Why this exists

After #37.2 lands the fixes, a separate verification pass is needed because the subagent that did the fixes may not have run the full suite. Different subagent, different focus = better signal.

Depends on

  • speckl#37.2 (P0+P1 fixes landed)

Unblocks

  • speckl issues #19-#36
## Problem Parent #37 success criteria include "all example specs in the repo compile without errors" and "unblocks #19-#36." This child is the verification pass. ## Scope Run the full Speckl example spec suite end-to-end. For each example, confirm clean compile. Report and close any tickets that are now unblocked. ## Acceptance Criteria - [x] Every example spec in the repo compiles without errors - [x] Run the test/CI command (or `make test` / `npm test` / equivalent) - [x] Comment on this issue with: list of examples verified, count, any remaining failures - [x] For each issue #19-#36 that becomes unblocked by this, add a comment: "Unblocked by #37.3 — #37 closed" ## Why this exists After #37.2 lands the fixes, a separate verification pass is needed because the subagent that did the fixes may not have run the full suite. Different subagent, different focus = better signal. ## Depends on - speckl#37.2 (P0+P1 fixes landed) ## Unblocks - speckl issues #19-#36
agent-cos commented 2026-06-02 03:14:04 +00:00
Author
Copy link

Verification Report — speckl#38 (Verify all example specs compile clean)

Repo: /home/sscoble/speckl
Compiler: node /home/sscoble/speckl/compiler/dist/index.js (built)
Target: -t all (TypeScript + PROV-O + CycloneDX + SPDX + Rust + Z3 + WASM)
Per-spec timeout: 30s
Run at: 2026-06-01 20:12 local

Summary

  • Total example specs found: 19 (17 .speck + 2 .speckdl)
  • Total PASS: 19
  • Total FAIL: 0
  • Internal compiler specs: 2 (forgejo-issue-workflow.speckdl, speckl-compile.speckdl) — both PASS
  • Vitest suite: 37/37 passing (parser 33, compiler E2E 4) in 543ms

Per-spec results

# Spec Result Wall time
1 examples/AccessControl.speck ✅ PASS 0s
2 examples/AccountLedger.speck ✅ PASS 0s
3 examples/DrugDosageCalculator.speck ✅ PASS 0s
4 examples/KafkaKRaft.speck ✅ PASS 0s
5 examples/KafkaProducer.speck ✅ PASS 1s
6 examples/OAuth2AuthorizationCode.speck ✅ PASS 0s
7 examples/Paxos.speck ✅ PASS 0s
8 examples/PaymentService.speck ✅ PASS 0s
9 examples/PreconditionTest.speck ✅ PASS 0s
10 examples/Raft.speck ✅ PASS 0s
11 examples/RetryHandler.speck ✅ PASS 0s
12 examples/SQLitePager.speck ✅ PASS 1s
13 examples/SQLiteWAL.speck ✅ PASS 0s
14 examples/TemperatureMonitor.speck ✅ PASS 0s
15 examples/TigerBeetleLedger.speck ✅ PASS 0s
16 examples/ToggleSwitch.speck ✅ PASS 0s
17 examples/TwoPhaseCommit.speck ✅ PASS 0s
18 examples/PromptOptimizer.speckdl ✅ PASS <30s
19 examples/SQLOptimizer.speckdl ✅ PASS <30s

All 19 specs compiled clean with -t all (every backend: TS, PROV-O, CycloneDX, SPDX, Rust, Z3, WASM). No warnings, no errors, exit code 0 for every spec.

Test suite

$ cd /home/sscoble/speckl/compiler && npm test
✓ __tests__/parser.test.ts (33 tests) 48ms
✓ src/__tests__/compiler.test.ts (4 tests) 15ms
Test Files  2 passed (2)
     Tests  37 passed (37)

Cross-reference: #19-#36 (example spec linkage)

⚠️ Important state: Every issue in the range #19 through #36 is already in the closed state at the time of this verification. The issue body's expectation of "unblock #19-#36" is therefore moot — there is nothing left to unblock in that range. For traceability, here is the linkage between those issues and the example specs they reference:

Issue State References Compile status
#19 "M0.1: Delete WAT/WASM generator" closed n/a (deletion) n/a
#20 "M0.2: Add typed IR" closed n/a (refactor) n/a
#23 "M1.2: Verify KRaft invariants with Z3" closed KafkaKRaft.speck ✅ PASS
#26 "M2.2: KRaft Rust reference impl" closed KafkaKRaft.speck ✅ PASS
#30 "M4.1: Full Raft specification" closed Raft.speck ✅ PASS
#31 "M4.2: TigerBeetle deep verification" closed TigerBeetleLedger.speck ✅ PASS
#32 "M4.3: OAuth 2.0 flow spec" closed OAuth2AuthorizationCode.speck ✅ PASS
#35 "DB.2: SQLitePager.speck" closed SQLitePager.speck ✅ PASS
#36 "DB.4: SQLiteWAL.speck" closed SQLiteWAL.speck ✅ PASS

Unblock candidates: 0 — none of #19-#36 are open, so the "unblock" AC is vacuously satisfied. The CoS may want to update parent #37 / #38 to reflect that the #19-#36 range was already closed before this audit began (a pre-condition drift, not a defect).

ACs

  • Every example spec in the repo compiles without errors — 19/19 PASS
  • Run the test/CI command — npm test ran, 37/37 tests pass
  • Comment on this issue with: list of examples verified, count, any remaining failures — this comment
  • For each issue #19-#36 that references a now-compiling example, note "unblock candidate" — table above; 0 candidates because all are already closed

Failure classification

No failures. The "verify-only" constraint is preserved — zero code changes were made.

Artifacts

Per-spec compile logs preserved at /tmp/speckl-verify-out/<SpecName>.log and per-spec output directories at /tmp/speckl-verify-out/<SpecName>/ (TS, PROV-O, CycloneDX, SPDX, Rust, Z3, WASM artifacts per spec).

— Verification subagent (speckl#38)

## Verification Report — speckl#38 (Verify all example specs compile clean) **Repo:** `/home/sscoble/speckl` **Compiler:** `node /home/sscoble/speckl/compiler/dist/index.js` (built) **Target:** `-t all` (TypeScript + PROV-O + CycloneDX + SPDX + Rust + Z3 + WASM) **Per-spec timeout:** 30s **Run at:** 2026-06-01 20:12 local ### Summary - **Total example specs found:** 19 (17 `.speck` + 2 `.speckdl`) - **Total PASS:** 19 - **Total FAIL:** 0 - **Internal compiler specs:** 2 (forgejo-issue-workflow.speckdl, speckl-compile.speckdl) — both PASS - **Vitest suite:** 37/37 passing (parser 33, compiler E2E 4) in 543ms ### Per-spec results | # | Spec | Result | Wall time | |---|------|--------|-----------| | 1 | `examples/AccessControl.speck` | ✅ PASS | 0s | | 2 | `examples/AccountLedger.speck` | ✅ PASS | 0s | | 3 | `examples/DrugDosageCalculator.speck` | ✅ PASS | 0s | | 4 | `examples/KafkaKRaft.speck` | ✅ PASS | 0s | | 5 | `examples/KafkaProducer.speck` | ✅ PASS | 1s | | 6 | `examples/OAuth2AuthorizationCode.speck` | ✅ PASS | 0s | | 7 | `examples/Paxos.speck` | ✅ PASS | 0s | | 8 | `examples/PaymentService.speck` | ✅ PASS | 0s | | 9 | `examples/PreconditionTest.speck` | ✅ PASS | 0s | | 10 | `examples/Raft.speck` | ✅ PASS | 0s | | 11 | `examples/RetryHandler.speck` | ✅ PASS | 0s | | 12 | `examples/SQLitePager.speck` | ✅ PASS | 1s | | 13 | `examples/SQLiteWAL.speck` | ✅ PASS | 0s | | 14 | `examples/TemperatureMonitor.speck` | ✅ PASS | 0s | | 15 | `examples/TigerBeetleLedger.speck` | ✅ PASS | 0s | | 16 | `examples/ToggleSwitch.speck` | ✅ PASS | 0s | | 17 | `examples/TwoPhaseCommit.speck` | ✅ PASS | 0s | | 18 | `examples/PromptOptimizer.speckdl` | ✅ PASS | <30s | | 19 | `examples/SQLOptimizer.speckdl` | ✅ PASS | <30s | All 19 specs compiled clean with `-t all` (every backend: TS, PROV-O, CycloneDX, SPDX, Rust, Z3, WASM). No warnings, no errors, exit code 0 for every spec. ### Test suite ``` $ cd /home/sscoble/speckl/compiler && npm test ✓ __tests__/parser.test.ts (33 tests) 48ms ✓ src/__tests__/compiler.test.ts (4 tests) 15ms Test Files 2 passed (2) Tests 37 passed (37) ``` ### Cross-reference: #19-#36 (example spec linkage) ⚠️ **Important state:** Every issue in the range **#19 through #36 is already in the `closed` state** at the time of this verification. The issue body's expectation of "unblock #19-#36" is therefore moot — there is nothing left to unblock in that range. For traceability, here is the linkage between those issues and the example specs they reference: | Issue | State | References | Compile status | |-------|-------|-----------|----------------| | #19 "M0.1: Delete WAT/WASM generator" | closed | n/a (deletion) | n/a | | #20 "M0.2: Add typed IR" | closed | n/a (refactor) | n/a | | #23 "M1.2: Verify KRaft invariants with Z3" | closed | `KafkaKRaft.speck` | ✅ PASS | | #26 "M2.2: KRaft Rust reference impl" | closed | `KafkaKRaft.speck` | ✅ PASS | | #30 "M4.1: Full Raft specification" | closed | `Raft.speck` | ✅ PASS | | #31 "M4.2: TigerBeetle deep verification" | closed | `TigerBeetleLedger.speck` | ✅ PASS | | #32 "M4.3: OAuth 2.0 flow spec" | closed | `OAuth2AuthorizationCode.speck` | ✅ PASS | | #35 "DB.2: SQLitePager.speck" | closed | `SQLitePager.speck` | ✅ PASS | | #36 "DB.4: SQLiteWAL.speck" | closed | `SQLiteWAL.speck` | ✅ PASS | **Unblock candidates: 0** — none of #19-#36 are open, so the "unblock" AC is vacuously satisfied. The CoS may want to update parent #37 / #38 to reflect that the #19-#36 range was already closed before this audit began (a pre-condition drift, not a defect). ### ACs - [x] Every example spec in the repo compiles without errors — **19/19 PASS** - [x] Run the test/CI command — `npm test` ran, **37/37 tests pass** - [x] Comment on this issue with: list of examples verified, count, any remaining failures — **this comment** - [x] For each issue #19-#36 that references a now-compiling example, note "unblock candidate" — **table above; 0 candidates because all are already closed** ### Failure classification No failures. The "verify-only" constraint is preserved — **zero code changes were made**. ### Artifacts Per-spec compile logs preserved at `/tmp/speckl-verify-out/<SpecName>.log` and per-spec output directories at `/tmp/speckl-verify-out/<SpecName>/` (TS, PROV-O, CycloneDX, SPDX, Rust, Z3, WASM artifacts per spec). — Verification subagent (speckl#38)
agent-cos commented 2026-06-02 03:14:33 +00:00
Author
Copy link

AC Checklist Update

The Forgejo MCP available to this subagent does not expose an issue-body edit endpoint (only create_issue, get_issue, list_issues, search_issues, add_comment, close_issue). I therefore cannot directly toggle the - [ ] boxes in the issue body. The verification results themselves are in my prior comment. Restating the ACs with results inline for the close-out review:

  • Every example spec in the repo compiles without errors → 19/19 PASS (AccessControl, AccountLedger, DrugDosageCalculator, KafkaKRaft, KafkaProducer, OAuth2AuthorizationCode, Paxos, PaymentService, PreconditionTest, Raft, RetryHandler, SQLitePager, SQLiteWAL, TemperatureMonitor, TigerBeetleLedger, ToggleSwitch, TwoPhaseCommit, PromptOptimizer, SQLOptimizer). 0 failures.
  • Run the test/CI command → cd compiler && npm test → 37/37 vitest tests pass (parser 33 + compiler E2E 4) in 543ms.
  • Comment on this issue with: list of examples verified, count, any remaining failures → see prior comment in this thread (markdown table + summary).
  • For each issue #19-#36 that becomes unblocked by this, add a comment "Unblocked by #37.3 — #37 closed" → 0 candidates. All of #19 through #36 are already in closed state as of this run. The "unblock" AC is vacuously satisfied (the table in the prior comment maps each closed issue to its referenced spec and confirms the spec compiles).

Note for the CoS / closer

If the issue closer needs the boxes physically toggled in the body, please run an update_issue on #38 from a tool that supports it, or close #38 with a reference to this verification thread. No code changes were made — this was a pure audit pass per the task constraints.

## AC Checklist Update The Forgejo MCP available to this subagent does not expose an issue-body edit endpoint (only `create_issue`, `get_issue`, `list_issues`, `search_issues`, `add_comment`, `close_issue`). I therefore cannot directly toggle the `- [ ]` boxes in the issue body. The verification results themselves are in my prior comment. Restating the ACs with results inline for the close-out review: - [x] **Every example spec in the repo compiles without errors** → 19/19 PASS (`AccessControl`, `AccountLedger`, `DrugDosageCalculator`, `KafkaKRaft`, `KafkaProducer`, `OAuth2AuthorizationCode`, `Paxos`, `PaymentService`, `PreconditionTest`, `Raft`, `RetryHandler`, `SQLitePager`, `SQLiteWAL`, `TemperatureMonitor`, `TigerBeetleLedger`, `ToggleSwitch`, `TwoPhaseCommit`, `PromptOptimizer`, `SQLOptimizer`). 0 failures. - [x] **Run the test/CI command** → `cd compiler && npm test` → **37/37 vitest tests pass** (parser 33 + compiler E2E 4) in 543ms. - [x] **Comment on this issue with: list of examples verified, count, any remaining failures** → see prior comment in this thread (markdown table + summary). - [x] **For each issue #19-#36 that becomes unblocked by this, add a comment "Unblocked by #37.3 — #37 closed"** → **0 candidates**. All of #19 through #36 are already in `closed` state as of this run. The "unblock" AC is vacuously satisfied (the table in the prior comment maps each closed issue to its referenced spec and confirms the spec compiles). ### Note for the CoS / closer If the issue closer needs the boxes physically toggled in the body, please run an `update_issue` on #38 from a tool that supports it, or close #38 with a reference to this verification thread. No code changes were made — this was a pure audit pass per the task constraints.
sscoble commented 2026-06-02 03:26:06 +00:00
Owner
Copy link

Closure Confirmation (CoS, 2026-06-02)

Closed by CoS dispatch verification pass.

  • All 4 ACs verified by subagent on 2026-06-01 20:12 PT
  • 19/19 example specs compile clean (TS, PROV-O, CycloneDX, SPDX, Rust, Z3, WASM backends)
  • 37/37 vitest tests pass in 543ms
  • #19-#36 are all already closed at audit time — AC #4 vacuously satisfied
  • Verification artifacts at /tmp/speckl-verify-out//

Parent speckl#37 children status:

  • #38 (verify) — ✅ CLOSED
  • #39 (triage) — timed out, re-dispatch in next cycle
  • #40 (fix P0+P1) — depends on #39, dispatch after triage ships
## Closure Confirmation (CoS, 2026-06-02) **Closed by CoS dispatch verification pass.** - All 4 ACs verified by subagent on 2026-06-01 20:12 PT - 19/19 example specs compile clean (TS, PROV-O, CycloneDX, SPDX, Rust, Z3, WASM backends) - 37/37 vitest tests pass in 543ms - #19-#36 are all already closed at audit time — AC #4 vacuously satisfied - Verification artifacts at /tmp/speckl-verify-out/<Name>/ Parent speckl#37 children status: - #38 (verify) — ✅ CLOSED - #39 (triage) — timed out, re-dispatch in next cycle - #40 (fix P0+P1) — depends on #39, dispatch after triage ships
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
Branches Tags
main
lagrangia-v1.1
ifblock-fix
now-fix
lagrangia-score
fix/speckl-55-ltl-inner-identifier-scope
fix/parser-precondition-postcondition
fix/compiler-enum-rewrite-parser-quotes
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels   
blocked

   
bug

   
design

   
docs

   
engineering

   
feature

   
infra

   
priority:high

   
priority:low

   
priority:medium

   
question
No labels
blocked
bug
design
docs
engineering
feature
infra
priority:high
priority:low
priority:medium
question
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: sscoble/speckl#38
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?