# Speckl Strategy — Phased Open Standard Approach > *The open standard is the root. Everything else grows from it.* --- ## Core Thesis Plan D (open standard + foundation) is the **engine**. All revenue flies by on the credibility, adoption, and ecosystem that the open standard builds. ![Plan D → C → A → B flow](diagrams/plan-flow.svg) **The flow:** Open standard (D) builds the language and community → hands-on consulting (C) validates the methodology → SaaS (A) scales it to more teams → compliance API (B) serves enterprise needs. --- ## Phase 1 — Establish the Standard (D + C) **Goal:** SpeckDL is real, public, and proven in at least one real system. ### Plan D Actions - **Open-source SpeckDL** under Apache 2.0 or MIT - Publish the language spec, a minimal reference compiler, and Z3 verification example - README: "The spec-first language for auditable software" - **Publish the Dark Provenance whitepaper** - Target: arxiv, dev blogs, standards-body working groups - Positioning: formal methods for the AI age - **Create a Speckl playground** — browser-based spec editor with compiled output + provenance graph - **Register domains**, set up minimal site ### Plan C Actions - **Sign consulting engagements** with regulated-industry companies - Deliverable: a functioning Speckl system + trained team + full compliance traceability - **Validate:** - Is SpeckDL expressive enough for real specs? - Does the tiered agent harness reduce spec-to-ship time? - What do compliance auditors actually need? --- ## Phase 2 — Build the SaaS (A, fed by D + C) **Goal:** Self-serve Speckl dev tool with paying users. ### Plan A Launch - **Speckl SaaS** — hosted platform where teams write Specks, the agent harness verifies them, and the platform maintains the provenance graph - **Features:** - Speck editor with live Z3 verification - Agent harness: Orchestrator → Team Lead → SME tier auto-scaling - TillDone condition tracking - Provenance graph browser ### How D feeds A - Open-source SpeckDL means new users arrive already familiar with the DSL - Community contributors find bugs, suggest features, write integrations - The playground converts browsers → SaaS signups - Certification program creates a pipeline of "Speckl Certified" engineers ### How C feeds A - Consulting case studies validate the product for prospects - Consulting engagements expose real-world requirements that shape the roadmap - Consulting clients become reference accounts and early SaaS customers --- ## Phase 3 — The Compliance API (B, fed by A) **Goal:** Enterprise compliance product with real provenance graph data. ### Plan B Launch - **Speckl Compliance API** — a standalone API that plugs into existing CI/CD - Ingest: spec documents, requirements, code - Output: compliance evidence bundles, traceability matrices, audit-ready reports - Compliance packs for regulated domains (DO-178C, IEC 62304, SOC 2, ISO 26262) ### How A feeds B - SaaS users generate real provenance graph data at scale - SaaS feature requests reveal what compliance officers need - SaaS revenue funds B development during long enterprise sales cycles ### How D continues feeding - The open standard is the market's trust signal - Standards bodies adopt Dark Provenance methodology - Speckl certification becomes a credential, and B product becomes the tool certified teams use --- ## Ownership & Governance **Speckl operates as a brand/property within Greybeard Holdings, LLC.** Not a separate entity. - SpeckDL is open-source (MIT/Apache 2.0) - Dark Provenance methodology is published freely - Trademark "Speckl" and certification authority held by Greybeard Holdings - Commercial products are Greybeard Holdings revenue lines under the Speckl brand --- ## Metrics | Phase | North Star Metric | |-------|------------------| | **1 (D+C)** | Specks written on the open standard | | **2 (A)** | Provenance graphs created (SaaS) | | **3 (B)** | Compliance reports exported | --- *For the full strategy document including budgets and revenue projections, see the private speckl-marketing repository.*