Compare commits

...
Sign in to create a new pull request.

10 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
9060c2b066 Match brain-fry typography and structure
- Top padding 8rem → 12rem
- 'Convenience is not capability' → blockquote callout (amber border, cream bg)
- Added h2 section headers: The Third Extraction Wave, The Decision Loop
- Added blockquote, h2, lead-question, and mobile breakpoint styles
- Same visual rhythm as ai-brain-fry post
2026-05-08 10:34:44 -07:00
7cd5b9ba5f PR review: callout, reframe closer, fix card excerpt
1. 'Convenience is not capability' pulled into its own lead-question
   callout (matches other blog post pattern)
2. Closer reframed: 'Are your capabilities compounding, or are you
   being extracted from?' — sharper, matches content
3. Blog card excerpt: replaced redundant question with context +
   shorter question
2026-05-08 10:20:02 -07:00
d53394a257 Remove redundant question in second paragraph — lead already asks it 2026-05-08 10:13:18 -07:00
349dcbe49d Engagement question: state early, repeat at end
Lead question now frames the article: Are you compounding your own
capability, or someone else's? Repeated at the close. The question
matches the content — it's about compounding, not about whose agent
you're using.
2026-05-08 10:11:19 -07:00
c0deef29d4 Strip RPG metaphor — let the argument stand on its own
The metaphor made something clear feel obscure. Removed all faction/NPC/
tech-tree/playstyle language. The point (THEIR capability, not yours)
is sharp enough without decoration.
2026-05-08 10:06:40 -07:00
024ceb8db4 Shift from faction to class: RPG metaphor is about playstyle, not sides
- Closer: What class are you playing? (not whose faction)
- NPC = class no one chooses, not wrong team
- tech tree / build / playstyle throughout, not faction
- Blog card and meta description updated to match
2026-05-08 09:59:16 -07:00
7fd3cf9959 Rewrite: soldier perspective, RPG metaphors, emphasize THEIR
- Title: You're Already in the Agentic Wars (not a spectator)
- Lead: Big Tech compounds THEIR capability (bolded)
- RPG metaphor: faction wars, tech trees, NPC grinding
- Reader is on the battlefield, not watching from the sidelines
- Closer: Whose faction are you grinding for?
2026-05-08 09:54:55 -07:00
cff883da34 Fix h1: drop subtitle, match shortened title 2026-05-08 09:50:25 -07:00
9320acf306 Tighten Agentic Wars: one cutting concern, focused argument, no engagement-bait
Based on feedback: the original was convoluted, covered too many topics,
and ended with a weak engagement question. Revised to one thread:
Big Tech agents compound platform capability, not yours. Everything
else — extraction pattern, decision loops, open-source alternative —
follows from that single concern. Ends with a question worth answering.
2026-05-08 09:20:13 -07:00
e00798cd74 Add Agentic Wars blog post and blog index card 2026-05-08 08:51:13 -07:00
2 changed files with 140 additions and 0 deletions

View file

@ -19,6 +19,19 @@ import BaseLayout from '../layouts/BaseLayout.astro';
<section class="posts">
<div class="posts-container">
<article class="post-card">
<a href="/blog/agentic-wars" class="post-link">
<div class="post-meta">
<span class="post-date">May 8, 2026</span>
<span class="post-tag">AI</span>
</div>
<h2>You're Already in the Agentic Wars</h2>
<p class="post-excerpt">
Meta has Hatch. Google has Remy. Everyone is building agents. Whose capability compounds?
</p>
</a>
</article>
<article class="post-card">
<a href="/blog/ai-brain-fry" class="post-link">
<div class="post-meta">

View file

@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
---
import BaseLayout from '../../layouts/BaseLayout.astro';
---
<BaseLayout
title="You're Already in the Agentic Wars"
description="Are your capabilities compounding, or are you being extracted from? Big Tech agents compound theirs. Yours can too — if you own them."
ogType="article"
canonicalUrl="/blog/agentic-wars"
>
<article class="post">
<header class="post-header">
<div class="post-meta">
<span class="post-date">May 8, 2026</span>
<span class="post-tag">AI</span>
</div>
<h1>You're Already in the Agentic Wars</h1>
</header>
<div class="post-content">
<p class="lead-question">Are you compounding your own capability, or someone else's?</p>
<p>Meta announced Hatch, a shopping agent for Instagram. Google unveiled Remy, a personal agent for Gemini. CNBC called it "the agentic wars." Everyone is building agents.</p>
<p>Hatch keeps you in Instagram. Remy keeps you in Gemini. Every prompt you type, every decision you delegate, every pattern the agent learns from you — all of it compounds for the platform, not for you. Their models get smarter. Their ad targeting gets sharper. Their lock-in gets deeper. You get more convenient.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Convenience is not capability.</p>
</blockquote>
<h2>The Third Extraction Wave</h2>
<p>Cloud computing extracted your infrastructure — you stopped owning servers, they started renting them back to you. Social media extracted your attention — you stopped thinking for minutes, they started selling your eyeballs by the thousand. Now agents are extracting your decision patterns. Every time you use a hosted agent, you are training someone else's model on your judgment. Their capability compounds. Yours does not.</p>
<h2>The Decision Loop</h2>
<p>I run my own agent system. Chief of staff, engineering, compliance, research — every agent reports to me. The value is not in the agent's output. The value is in the decision loop: when an agent drafts something and I review it, I am forced to articulate what I actually think. That compounds my judgment, not a platform's.</p>
<p>The alternative is not complicated. Run your own agents. Keep your data. Inspect and modify the models. The open-source tools exist today — the company building Hatch literally called their product "OpenClaw-inspired," which tells you who is copying whom.</p>
<p>The agentic wars will produce two outcomes. People who own their agents and compound their own capability. And people who rent from platforms and wonder why they feel more productive but less capable every quarter.</p>
<p>So: are your capabilities compounding, or are you being extracted from?</p>
</div>
</article>
</BaseLayout>
<style>
.post {
max-width: 720px;
margin: 0 auto;
padding: 12rem 2rem 6rem;
}
.post-header {
margin-bottom: 3rem;
}
.post-meta {
display: flex;
gap: 1rem;
margin-bottom: 1.5rem;
font-size: 0.875rem;
}
.post-date {
color: var(--color-text-muted);
}
.post-tag {
color: var(--color-amber);
font-weight: 600;
}
.post-header h1 {
font-family: var(--font-heading);
font-size: clamp(2rem, 4vw, 3rem);
color: var(--color-brown-dark);
line-height: 1.2;
margin: 0;
}
.post-content {
font-size: 1.125rem;
line-height: 1.8;
color: var(--color-text);
}
.post-content p {
margin: 0 0 1.5rem;
}
.post-content h2 {
font-family: var(--font-heading);
font-size: 1.5rem;
color: var(--color-brown-dark);
margin: 2.5rem 0 1rem;
letter-spacing: -0.01em;
}
.post-content blockquote {
border-left: 3px solid var(--color-amber);
padding: 1.25rem 1.5rem;
margin: 2rem 0;
background: var(--color-cream-warm);
font-style: italic;
font-size: 1.2rem;
line-height: 1.7;
}
.post-content blockquote p {
margin: 0;
}
.lead-question {
font-size: 1.15rem;
font-style: italic;
}
@media (max-width: 639px) {
.post {
padding: 5rem 1.25rem 3rem;
}
}
</style>