diff --git a/src/pages/blog/strip-mining-signs.astro b/src/pages/blog/strip-mining-signs.astro new file mode 100644 index 0000000..441457a --- /dev/null +++ b/src/pages/blog/strip-mining-signs.astro @@ -0,0 +1,185 @@ +--- +import BaseLayout from '../../layouts/BaseLayout.astro'; +--- + + + +
+
+ +

Three Signs Your Team Is Being Strip-Mined

+

+ The mindset shift that separates thriving teams from burned-out ones — cultivation over extraction. +

+
+ +
+

I first heard the term "strip-mining" applied to teams from an engineering director at a mid-size fintech company. She'd just lost three senior engineers in two months. When I asked what happened, she didn't talk about compensation or competing offers. She said: "We were strip-mining them. We just didn't call it that."

+ +

Strip-mining in software isn't about tools or processes. It's about a mindset: extract maximum value from each person, measure throughput, and replace when depleted. It works until it doesn't — and when it breaks, it breaks fast.

+ +

Sign 1: Velocity Is Up, Satisfaction Is Down

+ +

This is the canary in the coal mine. When your sprint velocity charts keep climbing but your team's engagement is flat or falling, you're not becoming more efficient. You're extracting harder.

+ +

The pattern is familiar: same team, more output, less joy. Engineers who used to debate architecture now just close tickets. Standups that used to surface real problems now produce status updates. The work is getting done, but nobody cares about it anymore.

+ +

If your metrics are up and your people are down, you're not optimizing. You're extracting.

+ +

Sign 2: Knowledge Is Concentrated, Not Distributed

+ +

Healthy teams spread knowledge. Strip-mined teams hoard it — not because people are selfish, but because there's no time or incentive to teach. Senior engineers become bottlenecks not because they want to, but because nobody else was given the space to learn.

+ +

Ask yourself: when was the last time someone on your team learned something new because they had time, not because they were forced? If the answer is measured in quarters, not weeks, your soil is depleted.

+ +

Sign 3: Departures Cluster Around the Same Moment

+ +

In strip-mined teams, attrition doesn't follow a normal distribution. It clusters. Three people leave in six weeks. Then nothing for a year. Then four more.

+ +

Why? Because teams talk. When one person decides they've had enough, they tell the others. The decision to leave becomes contagious — not because people are followers, but because the conditions that pushed the first person out are still there. Everyone else was just waiting to see if it was them or the system.

+ +

The Cultivation Alternative

+ +

Cultivation isn't the opposite of productivity. It's the opposite of extraction. Cultivated teams ship more over time because they get stronger, not because they get squeezed harder.

+ +

The shift from extraction to cultivation is simple to describe and hard to do: invest in your people like you invest in your infrastructure. Not with perks and team-building. With time, autonomy, and real ownership over meaningful work.

+ +

The test: Would your best engineer be a better engineer in six months if they stayed? If you can't answer yes with confidence, you're cultivating by accident, not by design.

+ +

Learn about the Soil Assessment →

+
+ + +
+ +
+ + diff --git a/src/pages/blog/three-questions-mentoring.astro b/src/pages/blog/three-questions-mentoring.astro new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a92f117 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/pages/blog/three-questions-mentoring.astro @@ -0,0 +1,176 @@ +--- +import BaseLayout from '../../layouts/BaseLayout.astro'; +--- + + + +
+
+ +

Three Questions That Changed How I Mentor

+

+ The simple mentoring framework that actually gets used — three questions that unlock real growth. +

+
+ +
+

I've been mentoring engineers for 15 years. I've read the books. I've done the frameworks. I've sat through sessions where we mapped career ladders and OKRs and growth plans. Most of it was noise.

+ +

What actually worked was three questions. That's it. No worksheets, no templates, no quarterly reviews. Just three questions that change the conversation from "How am I doing?" to "What am I building?"

+ +

The Three Questions

+ +

1. What are you building?

+

Not "What are you working on?" Building implies ownership. Intent. Stakes. The answer tells me whether they see their work as craft or as tasks. If they can't answer in terms of impact — "I'm building a payment flow that reduces checkout friction" — we need to zoom out before we zoom in on skills.

+ +

2. What's getting in your way?

+

Not "What are your blockers?" Blockers are Jira tickets. Obstacles are human: unclear authority, a broken relationship with PM, burnout they can't name yet. This question surfaces the real problems — usually interpersonal or structural — that no amount of skill-building will solve.

+ +

3. What do you want to be true in six months?

+

Not "Where do you see yourself in five years?" That's a fantasy exercise. Six months is close enough to be real and far enough to require change. The answer becomes the North Star for our next conversations. We don't make a plan. We just keep asking.

+ +

Why This Works

+ +

Most mentoring frameworks are built for HR. They're designed to produce documentation: growth plans, competency maps, 360 feedback. The three questions are built for humans. They're designed to produce clarity.

+ +

The magic isn't in the questions themselves. It's in the repetition. Ask them every two weeks for six months and watch what happens. The person starts hearing the questions in their own head. They start mentoring themselves.

+ +

That's the point. The best mentoring relationship is one that makes itself obsolete.

+ +

Read more in A Walk in Mentoring →

+
+ + +
+ +
+ + diff --git a/src/pages/books.astro b/src/pages/books.astro index ed74517..294ea21 100644 --- a/src/pages/books.astro +++ b/src/pages/books.astro @@ -31,8 +31,8 @@ import SharedForm from '../components/Form/SharedForm.astro';

"A cultivation playbook for technical leaders who are tired of strip-mining their teams."

@@ -46,8 +46,8 @@ import SharedForm from '../components/Form/SharedForm.astro';

"The simplest mentoring framework you'll actually use."

diff --git a/src/pages/contact.astro b/src/pages/contact.astro index 009ed93..432ccd5 100644 --- a/src/pages/contact.astro +++ b/src/pages/contact.astro @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ import SharedForm from '../components/Form/SharedForm.astro';

📅 Discovery Call

-

Schedule a 20-min call

+

Schedule a 20-min call

diff --git a/src/pages/speaking/soil-under-your-team.astro b/src/pages/speaking/soil-under-your-team.astro new file mode 100644 index 0000000..06489bf --- /dev/null +++ b/src/pages/speaking/soil-under-your-team.astro @@ -0,0 +1,207 @@ +--- +import BaseLayout from '../../layouts/BaseLayout.astro'; + +const talk = { + title: "The Soil Under Your Team", + premise: "Diagnose what's actually depleted before you fertilize. A diagnostic framework for team health in AI-augmented work.", + duration: "45–60 minutes", + type: "Workshop", + idealFor: ["Team leads", "Managers", "Engineering directors", "Founders"], + takeaways: [ + "The four soil nutrients every team needs", + "How to run a cultivation assessment", + "From diagnosis to cultivation roadmap" + ], + description: `Most team interventions fail because they prescribe before diagnosing. Someone reads a book on "psychological safety" and schedules trust falls. Someone hears about "developer experience" and buys a new CI tool. The team is still disengaged, now with a better linter. + +The problem isn't the interventions. It's that nobody knows what's actually depleted. + +In this workshop, I introduce the Soil Framework: four nutrients that determine whether a team thrives or burns out. We run a live diagnostic on your actual team (or a case study), identify which nutrients are depleted, and build a cultivation roadmap — not a set of prescriptions, but a sequence of interventions that match your specific soil profile. + +This isn't theory. I've used this framework with teams at startups and Fortune 500 companies. The teams that diagnose before prescribing show measurable improvement in engagement within 90 days. The teams that prescribe first... buy more tools.` +}; +--- + + + +
+
+
+ {talk.type} + {talk.duration} +
+

{talk.title}

+

{talk.premise}

+
+ +
+
+

The Talk

+ {talk.description.split('\n\n').map(para => ( +

{para}

+ ))} +
+ +
+

What You'll Learn

+
    + {talk.takeaways.map(takeaway => ( +
  • {takeaway}
  • + ))} +
+
+ +
+

Ideal For

+
+ {talk.idealFor.map(audience => ( + {audience} + ))} +
+
+
+ + +
+ +
+ +